Видео

The video fundamentally misunderstands idealism. It treats all forms of idealism as if they were subjective idealism, a specific type of philosophy akin to sollipsism and essentially represented by Berkeley. This mistake excludes a lot philosophers, from Plato and Aristotle to Descartes, Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel, who would all be considered idealists but not subjective idealists. They believed in the existence of reality beyond individual perception Ontological idealism proposes that the fundamental nature of existence is shaped by non-material rational principles to which matter is subjugated. These rational principles would provide the order to the world we experience. Epistemological idealism would entail that cognition is fundamentally shaped by rational principles within the mind that organize perception into understanding (Meaning things like causality, space, time, being... are the tools of the mind to paint it's canvas of the world). Political idealism I guess would posit that ideal principles guide social, political, historical... events and relations. By giving a flawed account of this the video misinforms the audience, it does not address the topic of marxist materialism VS idealism, and it's later jump towards the (insufficient and intellectually disingenuous) definition of political idealism and arguments that could be categorized as such, seems as non-sequitur.

Your labor is only valuable if the product you produce has value.

Womp womp

Long live the Luhansk People's Republic and the Donetsk People's Republic!

One example is EV vs. public transport: Under capitalism it's much more profitable if everyone buys their own electric vehicle. But the way more ecologic option would be public transport, a couple rentable cars, and bicycles. Another is longevity: Under capitalism it's beneficial if products die after a few years, and replacements are bought. A planned economy could design products with max. longevity in mind, so that eg. one vacuum cleaner could pass through generations.

Thanks to Biden and Obama

Hey! Thanks for a great video. I have one point to make though as stating that Belarusian is doing well was a heavy overstatement. I would even go so far as to say that at this point I am more confident in my English let alone Russian than my first(allegedly) native language - Belarusian. I would say that around 85% of people here use Belarusian either to show off or as part of their school/university programs. It is all unfortunate of course but true nevertheless.

Old people often feel nostalgic about the world they grew up in, but for old russians this feeling must be extreme..

It's interesting to compare old US movies to new ones. In old ones the KGB and soviet communists tended to be the villains, whereas in new ones it's the russian oligarchy (ie. capitalists). But to me it seems they still had more respect for the old soviets than for the new russian oligrachy.

The most frustrating about this is how the result of so much struggle could be dissolved so quickly. It took a revolution against the tsar-empire, a fight against nazi-germany, a subsequent cold-war to build and sustain this union, and just a few years of mismanagement and reappearance of nationalism to end it. The soviet-union might not have been perfect by any means, but they were a large entity that offered an alternative to the capitalist mode of production. Now in it's place there's just another empire with a fascist leader.

😂 Nazis are not far right! They’re still far left! Cousins of communists! There’s no way you can call fascism right wing !!!!

very well done, this is a very goood intro, good graph, and data to study this concept. If people can add CC in this video (or the entire series), this will be revolutionary for all people arround the world to learn nore about marxism. Cheerzz from Indonesia.

Wow dog water. Carring water for a dictator, love it.

Alot of young boys think they know what they're talking about in the comments section.. Do you have any idea what a nazi is??

Patrick Lancaster's channel has great content regarding the atrocities of these far right militia's targeting civilians of the Donbass.Watching his live reporting from pre Russian invasion gives alot of clarity to why Putin invaded and intervened claiming he is denazifying and demilitarizing the country of Ukraine

Idealism is stupid, one cannot simply defy the laws of physics. It's just that humans have free will/ego, God or whoever created us gave us the free will to choose.

The problem with the Nazis* is a video made by who ? The Marxist Projet? 😂 You have to be Marxist ideology ir be stupid to not see this 😂 now.. if you have 30 min in your life you can start reading WHY you don't see this and start thinking just like someone else say hahaha.. or maybe you're just another NPC* or a good sheep 😂 👌

The kremlin gives a fuck about none of this because they'll send rusich and russian imperial movements to the front lines to 'denazify' Ukraine but its really just a bunch of nihilistic oligarchs who need to conquer more territory to become stronger

15:06 I would like to add that around those years, most paint still had lead, so, I guess it was unexpectedly better to not paint them.

In Capital, Marx begins his analysis with an already existing capitalist economy. Marx can't explain how the capitalist economy came into existence because such an economy couldn't come into existence according to Marx's peculiar analysis of the capitalist economy where surplus-value created capital must first exist, but since surplus-value doesn't exist yet, there can be no capital to begin the capitalist economy. To overcome this inherent contradiction in Marx's "investigation", he begins Capital where we find an already existing capitalist economy: “The wealth of those societies in which the capitalist mode of production prevails, presents itself as “an immense accumulation of commodities," its unit being a single commodity. Our investigation must therefore begin with the analysis of a commodity.” The "investigation" needs to begin with how the commodities came into existence, that is how the capitalist economy came into existence, an oversight necessitated by a fraud. Let's see if we can commence the Capitalist economy using the following Marxist tautology, "Hitherto we have investigated how surplus-value emanates from capital; we have now to see how capital arises from surplus-value.":* (1) What do we need to initiate the Capitalist economy? Capital, of course. (2) So let's get some capital...where is this capital, according to Marx? (3) We get capital from surplus value, Marx tells us, "capital arises from surplus-value." (4) Okay, so let's get some surplus value to get capital. Where can we find surplus value, according to Marx? (5) "Surplus value emanates from capital", Marx's tautologically informs us! ------------------------- * Capital, Chapter 24, first sentence (1867)

Zato ih biju rusi

Wow imagine a centrally planned economy now with the AI revolution going on.💀

this has been recommended to me for years. I'm glad I hold off, until I read the Manuscripts and got a better hold of Alienation Theory

😮the Marxist Project “s skill in shaping the narrative would make even the German propaganda minister Goebbels envious.

3:34 :3 moment {yes i had to}

Hate Communism& marxism. Natsoc's are less evil. Sorry not sorry.

ruclips.net/video/XQc6mJ7u8gQ/видео.htmlsi=dARyXeI7PNRutrJ2

amazing

... a whole documentary series on nebula???

Putin told the world about this

❤

1) purely internal den Ovtavy

Standard of medical care? Are you kidding me, in soviet times maybe it looked good on paper but in reality for most part you had to give bribes, bribes, bribes until doctors sucked you and your family dry.

Your claim that"in socialist society people had more free time and could pursue their interests" is such a BS, I'll tell you what my parents did in their free time - they waited for hours in a line to buy a piece of meat. People were starting to queue on the day before the meat was to be delivered, they waited all thought the night until the shops opende the next day. Usually I would stand in a line in the evening, my father would stand though the night, and finally my mother would come in the moring to buy some piece of half fresh meat.

0:11 "Self evident" One reason why we think that soviet economics were inefficient is that two soviet economists "nikolai shmelev" and "vladimir popov" said so and explained it in their book "The turning point". I don't expect much from a ideology that claims to be sciencetific yet vehemently refuses to apply the sciencetific method in much of anything.

Hey comrades, my life is at the moment at a turning point and I need your advice. I have some more days to apply for university, and don't know which study course I shall take. In the future I want to contribute to the revolution in some way or another. That's my only wish. The question now: Which study course would you recommend me attend at university? I have thought about political sciene, sociology, (cultural and social) anthropology, psychology and philosophy, economics, but recently I thought of history as well. But what do you guys think, what's the best study course for someone who wants to devote him-/herself to the revolution? Thanks for your help! Have a nice day :)

😂

Hide your faces because why

Fascism is populist, 3% vote in the last elections? No seats in the Rada, Nationalist yes. Nazis just a few hundred, as most countries. Go again. MUSCOVIA HAS MANY MORE.

Thats map of imperial russia with sickle and hammer

Heisenberg was an idealist, most of the workings of quantum mechanics suggest idealism. I can't help but say that the idea that pre-colonial indigenous Americans were not destructive is completely a false notion (somewhat idealistic). Destructiveness is part of human nature. We did not see that materialism in action improved the human condition whatsoever. The 20th century was the bloodiest in human history, and a large part of that was due to Marxism and Capitalism.

Holly sish this makes so much sence, that what’s I was thinking on my own before 2:58

Rhis fella has a great lecture on dialectics, i dont think hes a fan of Marxism but he sure understands it and the epistemological/philosophical roots in gnosticism. ruclips.net/video/YfwMpxhrCYE/видео.htmlsi=quEC4JHqwtFwf1BC

У каклов очко подгорело с правды. Ору)

Denacifikovat !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what's the name of the music?

Weirdos😂

Marxists and their Satanist puppet masters, when caught in a lie their responses has nothing to do with the opponent's observation. We see this with Marx concerning his embarrassing non-reply reply to fellow socialist, Pierre Joseph Proudhon, regarding the latter's devastating critique of Marx's [whole] Materialist philosophy: Marx posits this Materialist philosophy with the following, "The hand mill gives you feudal society, the steam mill industrial capitalism." - Karl Marx, The Poverty of Philosophy (1847), p. 100. When corrected by fellow socialist Pierre Joseph Proudhon that the particular institution needed for this new capitalist society - the new division of labor - already existed to create the tools/machines necessary for the capitalist system, Marx balked, with a non-reply reply (because there is no reply that can alter a self-evident fact): Machines are "a productive force," not a "social production relation," not an "economic category." -- Ibid, p. 115. Marx simply restates three of his axioms, neglecting to say which must come first. Obviously, the new capitalistic institution division of labor must come first to create the [materialist] tools/machines, not vice versa as Marx's materialist philosophy [mis]informs us.

Marx's Foundational Tautology Marx writes (Chapter 24, first paragraph, Capital, 1867), "Hitherto we have investigated how surplus-value emanates from capital; we have now to see how capital arises from surplus-value." See the tautology? How did this tautology get past the initial reviews? How did this tautology survive the intervening 157 years without being discovered, except for this political scientist? This again illustrates the magnitude of the Marxist co-option of our institutions. Let's analyze the sentence's tautology... Surplus value is generated by capital, but capital is created by surplus value!

Former admirer of Austrian Economics. I can no longer deny the reality i see before me. Hyper-individualism, and competition, are inherently destructive.